Converting Existing Buildings into Embedded Networks

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

Today we are looking at the ‘retrofit process’ for embedded networks. We focus on the eastern states, other than Victoria – which has its own regulatory framework.

Under the National Electricity Rules (NER), any party that engages in an electricity transmission or distribution activity must either be registered with the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) as a network service provider (NSP) or operate under an exemption. If that same entity sells electricity then it will also require either a retail exemption or a retail authorisation. We’ve discussed that distinction in more detail here.

A retrofit involves an Embedded Network Operator (ENO) converting an existing building (with separately metered sites) into an embedded network. This results in the building having a single connection point where electricity is purchased in bulk and then on-sold to the occupants. At the same time, the ENO can install solar to reduce the overall cost of electricity at the site.

The conversion of an existing building into an embedded network involves unique regulatory challenges.

ENOs are required to follow the processes set out in s 4.9 of the AER’s Network Exemption Guideline. Most ENOs struggle with that task, so we have decided to set out some key points to be considered.

Consent from occupants

A pivotal concept in the s 4.9 conversion process is consent. Consent is required to both convert an existing building into an embedded network and to supply occupants pursuant to an electricity supply agreement.

When considering what is required to obtain consent, ENOs should consider the principles applicable to explicit informed consent which we discuss here.

Section 4.9.1 Requirements

Section 4.9.1 of the AER’s Network Exemption Guideline sets out the process that ENOs must follow to convert an existing site into an embedded network.

An ENO must ensure that information regarding the proposed retrofit is ‘clearly, fully and adequately disclosed, and that it has regard to a person’s capacity to provide consent.’ Once again we come back to the pivotal role of consent.

When seeking consent, an ENO must provide its prospective customers with a disclosure document. It is important to note that the disclosure document is not a marketing document. The contents of the disclosure document are set out in the Network Exemption Guideline and ENOs must strictly follow that document. Along with the disclosure document, ENOs must provide a copy of the proposed electricity supply agreement (which they will need separate consent for) and contact details for a representative.

There is a clear process that needs to be followed and the documentation used must be compliant. If an ENO fails to comply with the AER’s Network Exemption Guideline in seeking consent for a retrofit, the ENO will likely need to start the process again- from scratch. This can mean months of unnecessary delay.

Help complying

Most ENOs find it very hard to meet the requirements of s 4.9.1 and that is one area that we can help you with. We can provide you with a disclosure document, record of attendance, fee disclosure, records of contact, and an opt-out policy.

Simply provide your details on our embedded network compliance page.

More to explorer

Solar panel, sun battery, alternative energy

Penalty for Queensland generator over inability to supply frequency control services

Frequency control ancillary services (FCAS) is used by AEMO to maintain the frequency of the system within tolerances and around 50 cycles per second. FCAS is a mechanism for ensuring balance within the market which can be variable and volatile. FCAS providers are especially important as the uptake of renewable energy within the NEM continues. On 22 February 2021, the AER announced that CS Energy has paid $200,000 in penalties for allegedly failing to ensure that it could provide FCAS

Man in jail behind bars for a crime

Substantial increases in penalties for non-compliance in the energy sector

Summary: As a result of recent reforms discussed below, non-compliant energy businesses in NECF now face penalties of up to 10 percent of their annual turnover or $10,000,000. Consequently, all energy businesses should seriously re-examine their compliance programs and regulatory controls.

Red dart in the center of a target

The proposal to ban embedded networks in Victoria

In October 2018, the Victorian Government announced an election commitment to ban embedded networks in new residential developments in Victoria. Since that time little has been publicly said about the proposed ban and, presumably, industry has lobbied the relevant ministers to highlight benefits of embedded networks and the impact of a ban on consumers and the industry. The election commitment was not forgotten however and the Victorian Government appointed an Expert Panel whose work consists of reviewing the options available

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *