Converting Existing Buildings into Embedded Networks

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

Today we are looking at the ‘retrofit process’ for embedded networks. We focus on the eastern states, other than Victoria – which has its own regulatory framework.

Under the National Electricity Rules (NER), any party that engages in an electricity transmission or distribution activity must either be registered with the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) as a network service provider (NSP) or operate under an exemption. If that same entity sells electricity then it will also require either a retail exemption or a retail authorisation. We’ve discussed that distinction in more detail here.

A retrofit involves an Embedded Network Operator (ENO) converting an existing building (with separately metered sites) into an embedded network. This results in the building having a single connection point where electricity is purchased in bulk and then on-sold to the occupants. At the same time, the ENO can install solar to reduce the overall cost of electricity at the site.

The conversion of an existing building into an embedded network involves unique regulatory challenges.

ENOs are required to follow the processes set out in s 4.9 of the AER’s Network Exemption Guideline. Most ENOs struggle with that task, so we have decided to set out some key points to be considered.

Consent from occupants

A pivotal concept in the s 4.9 conversion process is consent. Consent is required to both convert an existing building into an embedded network and to supply occupants pursuant to an electricity supply agreement.

When considering what is required to obtain consent, ENOs should consider the principles applicable to explicit informed consent which we discuss here.

Section 4.9.1 Requirements

Section 4.9.1 of the AER’s Network Exemption Guideline sets out the process that ENOs must follow to convert an existing site into an embedded network.

An ENO must ensure that information regarding the proposed retrofit is ‘clearly, fully and adequately disclosed, and that it has regard to a person’s capacity to provide consent.’ Once again we come back to the pivotal role of consent.

When seeking consent, an ENO must provide its prospective customers with a disclosure document. It is important to note that the disclosure document is not a marketing document. The contents of the disclosure document are set out in the Network Exemption Guideline and ENOs must strictly follow that document. Along with the disclosure document, ENOs must provide a copy of the proposed electricity supply agreement (which they will need separate consent for) and contact details for a representative.

There is a clear process that needs to be followed and the documentation used must be compliant. If an ENO fails to comply with the AER’s Network Exemption Guideline in seeking consent for a retrofit, the ENO will likely need to start the process again- from scratch. This can mean months of unnecessary delay.

Help complying

Most ENOs find it very hard to meet the requirements of s 4.9.1 and that is one area that we can help you with. We can provide you with a disclosure document, record of attendance, fee disclosure, records of contact, and an opt-out policy.

Simply provide your details on our embedded network compliance page.

More to explorer

Time to understand “Ring-fencing”

On 3 November 2021, The Australian Energy Regulator (AER)  concluded and published a revision of the Ring-fencing Guideline. Parties are expected to be fully compliant with the updated Guideline (version 3) by 3 February 2022. The Ring-fencing Guideline was revised to establish a framework and controls for a competitive market for deploying community-scale batteries and Stand-Alone Power Systems (SAPS). By separating monopoly network services and avoiding cross-subsidisation of large Distributed Network Service Provider (DNSP), the AER seeks to make energy

Standardised Models for Regulated Metering Services

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is developing a standardised metering services model to use in the future across all jurisdictions. The AER intends to standardise the presentation of distributors’ metering expenditure for the AER’s assessment. The outcomes sought are: Better and more transparent presentation for consumers; Unified understanding amongst distributors; and More time-efficient processing of proposals by the AER. Currently, the AER assesses each distributors proposal for metering models individually, including their CAPEX, OPEX, revenue and pricing models. The absence

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *