Dousing the phoenix: Three measures that could curb this dodgy insolvency practice

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
















By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter.

We mentioned last time that the Government is consulting on some options for curbing the misuse of the ‘safety net’ available for companies unable to pay employment entitlements on insolvency. There, we discussed the possibility of Government action to stop an illegal ‘phoenix company’, otherwise known as ‘phoenixing’ or ‘phoenix activity’. Today’s article is a deep dive into this particular practice: What is it, and what could be done to put a stop to it?

The definition of “phoenix activity”

In their 2015 report Business Set-Up, Transfer and Closure, the Productivity Commission defined illegal phoenix activity as:
“the shifting of a business’s assets but not liabilities away from a distressed business to a newly created company that continues to trade free of tax and other debts from the distressed business” (p28).

The negative consequences of illegal phoenix activity are significant. First, this activity undermines business confidence. The widespread occurrence of this activity in the construction industry, for example, means uncertainty for tradespeople that their bills will be paid. Second, this activity is a form of tax avoidance, depriving the government and ultimately the tax-payer of revenue that must be acquired from other sources

Three measures that could curb phoenix activity

(1) A Director Identification Number

As recently as June 6, Labor re-iterated its support for introducing a ‘Director Identification Number’ (DIN). The DIN would be a verified digital identity required by every Director on registration of a company. The aim of this measure would be to reduce the prevalence of directors registering new phoenix companies using several variations of their legal name and thus shirking their existing legal obligations. The Federal Government confirmed earlier this year that it is still considering whether or not to introduce such a measure.

(2) GST on new residential property purchases

In last month’s Budget, the Federal Government announced its plans to change the way in which Goods & Services Tax (GST) is paid on new property developments. Currently, the seller of a newly constructed residential property or subdivision is required to pay GST on the purchase price. This change means that the GST component must now be paid by the purchaser immediately on settlement. One reason that the Government has given for this change is that it removes the incentive of a development company to ‘phoenix’ out of its GST obligation.

(3) The Phoenix Taskforce

The Phoenix Taskforce, established in 2014, is a multiple state and federal agency initiative focused on combating illegal phoenix activity in accordance with the existing legal framework. Its strategy is tailored differently towards high-risk, medium-risk and low-risk groups with an emphasis on law enforcement at the high end and education at the low end. The work of this taskforce has resulted in a number of successful prosecutions (including jail time) and the recovery of significant tax debts and penalties.

More to explorer

notes on board

How to Manage Multiple Compliance Deadlines: A Case Study

Compliance managers in the energy sector are constantly juggling a large work load with competing deadlines. Managing time effectively is a core skill for compliance managers. In this article, we will present a hypothetical case study of a compliance manager in an energy retailer who has to juggle multiple compliance tasks and deadlines, and how they can use some strategies and tools to manage their workload and prioritise effectively. We will also share some insights and tips from Compliance Quarter,

laptop on table top

How to Avoid Compliance Risks by Effective Communication: A Case Study

Compliance managers in the energy sector face many challenges in ensuring that their businesses comply with the regulatory framework. One of the most common and frustrating situations is when their advice is ignored or overridden by senior management or other stakeholders, exposing the business to potential compliance risks and penalties. In this article, we will present a hypothetical case study of a compliance manager in an energy retailer who faced this scenario and how it affected the business outcomes. We

Contemporary design of multifamily living houses. Modern luxury apartments buildings.

Modernising Electricity Regulation: The AES Framework and Embedded Networks in Western Australia

Background The existing licensing framework overseeing the sale and supply of electricity in Western Australia (WA) has struggled to adapt to the rapid expansion of emerging and atypical electricity business models in recent years. To address this, in 2019, the then Minister for Energy commissioned Energy Policy WA to assess the regulatory framework in Western Australia. In 2020, Energy Policy WA initiated consultations on a proposed regulatory framework for various categories of ‘alternative electricity services’ called the Alternative Electricity Services

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *