Dousing the phoenix: Three measures that could curb this dodgy insolvency practice

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
















By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter.

We mentioned last time that the Government is consulting on some options for curbing the misuse of the ‘safety net’ available for companies unable to pay employment entitlements on insolvency. There, we discussed the possibility of Government action to stop an illegal ‘phoenix company’, otherwise known as ‘phoenixing’ or ‘phoenix activity’. Today’s article is a deep dive into this particular practice: What is it, and what could be done to put a stop to it?

The definition of “phoenix activity”

In their 2015 report Business Set-Up, Transfer and Closure, the Productivity Commission defined illegal phoenix activity as:
“the shifting of a business’s assets but not liabilities away from a distressed business to a newly created company that continues to trade free of tax and other debts from the distressed business” (p28).

The negative consequences of illegal phoenix activity are significant. First, this activity undermines business confidence. The widespread occurrence of this activity in the construction industry, for example, means uncertainty for tradespeople that their bills will be paid. Second, this activity is a form of tax avoidance, depriving the government and ultimately the tax-payer of revenue that must be acquired from other sources

Three measures that could curb phoenix activity

(1) A Director Identification Number

As recently as June 6, Labor re-iterated its support for introducing a ‘Director Identification Number’ (DIN). The DIN would be a verified digital identity required by every Director on registration of a company. The aim of this measure would be to reduce the prevalence of directors registering new phoenix companies using several variations of their legal name and thus shirking their existing legal obligations. The Federal Government confirmed earlier this year that it is still considering whether or not to introduce such a measure.

(2) GST on new residential property purchases

In last month’s Budget, the Federal Government announced its plans to change the way in which Goods & Services Tax (GST) is paid on new property developments. Currently, the seller of a newly constructed residential property or subdivision is required to pay GST on the purchase price. This change means that the GST component must now be paid by the purchaser immediately on settlement. One reason that the Government has given for this change is that it removes the incentive of a development company to ‘phoenix’ out of its GST obligation.

(3) The Phoenix Taskforce

The Phoenix Taskforce, established in 2014, is a multiple state and federal agency initiative focused on combating illegal phoenix activity in accordance with the existing legal framework. Its strategy is tailored differently towards high-risk, medium-risk and low-risk groups with an emphasis on law enforcement at the high end and education at the low end. The work of this taskforce has resulted in a number of successful prosecutions (including jail time) and the recovery of significant tax debts and penalties.

More to explorer

Autumn leaves falling with copy space on black background

Avoiding Compliance Atrophy: The Critical Role of Assurance Reviews for Growing Energy Retailers

As energy retailers expand their customer base and operations, ensuring ongoing compliance with regulatory obligations can become increasingly challenging. A key risk is “compliance atrophy” – where initially compliant documents, processes and systems slowly deteriorate and waste away over time if not regularly monitored and reviewed. What is compliance atrophy? Compliance atrophy is typically a result of documents, processes and systems being ‘updated’ or ‘reworded’ to reflect changes in focus for the business and input from other stakeholders including marketing

person holding debit card

AER payment difficulty framework review

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is conducting a review of the consumer protections available under the National Energy Customer Framework (NECF) for those experiencing payment difficulties. On 14 May 2024, the AER released an issues paper for consultation. The review is driven by the commitment in Action 8 of the ‘Towards Energy Equity’ strategy in which the AER committed to considering whether improvements could be made to the NECF to ensure that consumers experiencing payment difficulties are identified early, engaged

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *