The low-down on the retail client money reforms for OTC derivatives

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

Today’s article is our third piece on OTC derivatives regulation in Australia. In today’s piece, we take a look at the new Treasury Laws Amendment (2016 Measures No. 1) Act 2017 (the Amendment Act), which was passed in to law in April of this year. This new law strengthens the regulatory regime for entities that trade over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives to retail clients.

Today’s article is our third piece on OTC derivatives regulation in Australia. In

 

By Dr. Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter. 

The Amendment Act has a transition period of 12 months so that industry and regulators can getup to speed.

Background: lack of protection for retail clients

We have already mentioned the difference between the regulatory environment for financial products (such as derivatives), that are traded in financial markets, and those that are traded OTC (see OTC derivatives trading in Australia – are you playing by the rules?). Another important distinction is that between financial products marketed to wholesale clients and those marketed to retail clients.

Under the Corporations Act 2001 there are a range of tests for determining whether an entity counts as a ‘wholesale client’ or a ‘retail client’ (see primarily chapter seven, division 2 of that Act), but in general, wholesale clients tend to deal in expensive customer products, be large entities and/or sophisticated investors.

In most cases, those with Australian Financial Services licenses (licensees) have special obligations to protect the interests of retail clients. However, until the passage of the Amendment Act, there were no such rules in place with respect to the OTC derivatives of retail clients.  One area of particular vulnerability for retail clients, were the old rules with respect to retail client money.

For most financial products, licensees were required to hold client money on trust, and could not use that money for their own purposes (for example, as working capital) or for the purposes of other clients. But there was no such restriction for licensees that wished to use money of retail clients of OTC derivatives.

This lack of restriction (which was out of step with overseas jurisdictions such as the US and UK), meant a significant risk for retail clients: If their money was used for some other purpose and the licensee went insolvent, the client would have had a hard time getting their money back

The client money reforms

The Amendment Act does two key things:

  • First, it requires that, in general, licensees hold retail OTC derivative client money on trust. Note, there is an exception which has generally been overlooked by commentators to date. If the derivative is ‘cleared’ through an authorised clearing and settlement facility, then then old rules apply, rather than the ones in the new amendment Act (for further explanation of ‘clearing’ see our earlier piece at https://compliancequarter.com.au/otc-derivatives-trading-australia/).
  • Second, it gives the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) the power to issue client money reporting and reconciliation rules. This is intended to ensure that ASIC will have the power to monitor and enforce the new limitations on the use of client money. For example, it will allow ASIC to see whether client money has been used for a non-permitted purpose.

For further details, see the Amendment Act itself at http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r5791_aspassed/toc_pdf/16206b01.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.

See also, the explanatory memoranda prepared by Treasury at

http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/ems/r5791_ems_63cd274c-7ace-4963-b55e-4c922fd01fa2/upload_pdf/607318.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.

And if you think we could be of any further assistance, do get in touch.

More to explorer

Autumn leaves falling with copy space on black background

Avoiding Compliance Atrophy: The Critical Role of Assurance Reviews for Growing Energy Retailers

As energy retailers expand their customer base and operations, ensuring ongoing compliance with regulatory obligations can become increasingly challenging. A key risk is “compliance atrophy” – where initially compliant documents, processes and systems slowly deteriorate and waste away over time if not regularly monitored and reviewed. What is compliance atrophy? Compliance atrophy is typically a result of documents, processes and systems being ‘updated’ or ‘reworded’ to reflect changes in focus for the business and input from other stakeholders including marketing

person holding debit card

AER payment difficulty framework review

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is conducting a review of the consumer protections available under the National Energy Customer Framework (NECF) for those experiencing payment difficulties. On 14 May 2024, the AER released an issues paper for consultation. The review is driven by the commitment in Action 8 of the ‘Towards Energy Equity’ strategy in which the AER committed to considering whether improvements could be made to the NECF to ensure that consumers experiencing payment difficulties are identified early, engaged

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *