Financial crime doesn’t pay – three ways in which wrongdoers may soon be hit in the pocket

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

Previously, we discussed some core areas where financial professionals need to think about their own compliance, including compliance with the law and professional obligations. What exactly will happen though, to people and organisations that are in serious breach of their obligations?

Recent cases suggest that regulatory agencies and the courts will deal severely with serious non-compliance. For example, in March the Federal Court agreed that Tabcorp would be required to pay a $45 million civil penalty for breaches of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws. Referring to this case, the CEO of the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), Paul Jevtovic commented:

“There was a serious failure in the corporate governance and the size of the penalty reflects a significant and extensive non-compliance”.

A take-home message, perhaps, is that Government regulators and the courts will crack down on not just explicitly ‘criminal’ conduct, but also less-reprehensible conduct such as not having proper systems in place. Rather than pursuing criminal proceedings in these cases it is common for the regulator to pursue a ‘civil penalty’ where an organisation or individual can be liable for wrongdoing even if their behaviour has not reached a ‘criminal’ level.

This toughened approach has been backed by a recent Senate Economic References Committee report (also released in March) concerning ‘penalties for white-collar crime and corporate and financial misconduct in Australia’. Below we set out three changes to the civil penalty regime that have been recommended by the Senate Committee. It remains to be seen if these will be adopted by the Government.

1) The Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) may be able to issue more infringement notices

If an organisation breaches market integrity rules or continuous disclosure obligations, they can be issued an infringement notice. This is a kind of ‘speeding ticket’ for low to-medium level non-compliance that requires the payment of a fine. If not complied with ASIC can then begin court proceedings. Infringement Notices are not currently an option for dealing with breaches of the financial services and managed investments provisions of the Corporations Act 2001. The Committee recommended that the Government extend the applicability of infringement notices into these areas.

2) The size of civil penalties may increase

The Tabcorp case demonstrates in some cases (such as breaching anti-money laundering laws), civil penalties can be sizable and therefore act as an effective deterrent. However, the maximum civil penalty for breaches of the Corporations Act 2001, which provides the general regulatory environment for corporations, is only $1 million. The Senate committee has recommended increasing this (though not by any specific amount) in order to deter those who might be willing to ‘wear the cost’ of such a penalty.

3) ASIC may be given ‘disgorgement’ powers in relation to non-criminal proceedings

Under current law, if an individual or organisation financially benefits from a crime, and is convicted of that crime, that benefit can be taken off them via a process under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. But there is no equivalent power for an individual or organisation that has profited from wrongdoing, but been subject to a civil penalty. The Committee recommended that the Government introduce ‘disgorgement’ powers for ASIC, allowing them to recover ill-gotten gains in such cases.

More to explorer

photo of a kangaroo on road

ACCC report highlights challenges and opportunities for retail electricity market

In December 2023, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) released its latest report on the National Electricity Market (NEM), covering the period from August 2022 to July 2023. The report examines the state of competition and consumer outcomes in the retail electricity market, the impact of the energy transition on the contract market and retailers’ ability to manage financial risk, and the need for reforms to improve the conditions for competition and deliver better outcomes for consumers. Key findings

electricity poles by the road

How to comply with the life support equipment registration rules

Introduction If you are a retailer selling energy to customers who require life support equipment, you need to be aware of your obligations under the National Energy Retail Rules (NERR). Life support equipment is any equipment that is needed to sustain or support the life of a person, such as oxygen concentrators, kidney dialysis machines, ventilators, and so on.  The NERR provides a definition of life support equipment. Customers who rely on such equipment are entitled to certain protections under

Free people walking image

Understanding Part 3 of the National Energy Retail Rules: Customer Hardship

Introduction The National Energy Retail Rules (NERR) are a set of rules that regulate the retail sale of electricity and gas to customers in those states that have adopted the national framework within the National Energy Market (NEM). The NERR aim to protect the interests of customers and promote efficient and competitive retail markets. The NERR cover various aspects of the retail relationship, such as contracts, billing, payment, disconnection, connection, metering and customer information. One of the key components of

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *