Consultation on draft exempt embedded network guidelines (part one): embedded network managers take note

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

On 17 November, the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) released the latest Draft Guideline – Exemption from Registration as a Network Service Provider (the Draft Guideline) and an accompanying Issues Paper[1]. AER is consulting on all aspects of the proposed amendments, and encourages submissions from stakeholders by 15 January 2018.

embedded network
Photo by ål nik on Unsplash
By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter.

Of the changes in the Draft Guideline, three relate to the Transmission Connection and Planning Arrangements final rule determination, and four relate to other matters necessary to update and clarify aspects of the guideline.

As the Embedded Network Manager (ENM) regulatory changes have just come into effect (1 December 2017), this article looks at two small changes in the draft Guideline that could have a direct impact on the ENM. In our next piece, part two on the Draft Guideline, we will look at the changes resulting from the Transmission Connection and Planning Arrangements final rule determination.

It is worth remembering that it is a regulatory requirement that ENMs be familiar with the Guideline- Exemption from Registration as a Network Service Provider[2].

First Change: Providing Embedded Network Information

A successful embedded network, both from a commercial and a compliance perspective, requires that a range of functions are performed in a co-ordinated manner. These functions include providing network services (‘Exempt Embedded Network Service Providers’[3]), selling electricity (‘Exempt Sellers’), and facilitating customers going on or off-market (ENMs). These functions could all be performed by distinct business entities or different parts of the one business. A crucial aspect of this co-operation is sharing information.

A change to the Draft Guideline (see 4.8.1.3) provides that the Exempt Embedded Network Service Provider (EENSP) must now specify in an embedded network customer’s bill:

  • ENM contact details
  • the parent NMI for the embedded network[4]

In addition, the parent NMI must be made available on request to:

  • the customer
  • the customer’s retailer
  • the ENM appointed to the embedded network.

This is aimed at ensuring that customers, ENMs and retailers have the information necessary to support the customer’s right of retail choice.

Second Change: Dispute Resolution

The Draft Guideline propose to amend part 4.1.6 of the Draft Guideline and add a condition (4.1.13) to harmonise the dispute resolution requirements with the requirements in the Draft Retail Exempt Selling Guideline.[5] This means that an EENSP needs to be a member, or subject to, an energy ombudsman scheme, where permitted to do so and notify residential customers of their right of access to such a scheme.

So how does this change impact on ENMs specifically? First, this means that businesses which provide several different embedded network functions can further align their dispute resolution policies and procedures as they will be subject to almost identical requirements for their exempt seller and EENSP functions. Second, a customer with a complaint or dispute may not always know who provides which embedded network functions, so it is important that ENMs knows the dispute resolution rules for all embedded network functions.

Remember, that these are simply proposed changes and AER welcomes your feedback by 15 January 2018.

AER also invites stakeholders to attend a forum on Thursday 14 December 2017 to discuss the proposed amendments. The forum is at 9.10am AEST and will be held via VCU in their Canberra, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart and Townsville offices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] See https://www.aer.gov.au/networks-pipelines/guidelines-schemes-models-reviews/review-of-network-service-provider-registration-exemption-guideline-2017-18.

[2] See http://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/Files/Electricity/NEM/Retail_and_Metering/Metering-Procedures/2017/Qualification-Procedure-MP-MDP-ENM.pdf, appendix A.

[3] Sometimes called ‘Embedded Network Operators’.

[4] The ‘Parent NMI’ is the National Metering Identifier at the parent connection point of the embedded network. This unique identifier is used in the Market Settlement and Transfer Solutions (MSATS) system to specify the ‘gate meter’ to the embedded network and accurately determine energy use in the embedded network.

[5] We discussed these proposed changes here https://compliancequarter.com.au/proposed-new-dispute-resolution-obligations-exempt-sellers/.

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *