Banking Executive Accountability Regime Exposure Draft – Part Two

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

Last time in The Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) Exposure Draft – Part One we talked about the new role of an ‘accountable person’ under the proposed Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR), as described in the Government’s recent exposure draft Bill. In today’s piece, part two, we look at the what happens when an accountable person, or the bank itself, fail to fulfil its obligations under BEAR.

By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter

 

Existing Powers of APRA

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) already has a range of powers that it uses to ensure Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions (ADIs) (including banks) fulfil their responsibilities under the prudential supervision requirements. APRA’s current powers include:

  • the power of direction (section 11CA of the Banking Act 1959), which enables APRA to require a regulated entity to take action to address a particular issue;
  • making prudential standards under section 11AF of the Banking Act 1959, which ADIs must comply with;
  • revocation of banking licenses under section 9 of the Banking Act 1959;
  • removing or disqualifying a director, senior manager or auditor under Division 3 of Part II of the Banking Act 1959; and
  • injunctions and other orders from a court.

If the new proposals come into force, APRA will still be able to use these existing powers, but the BEAR will also introduce a range of new powers.

New Powers relating to ‘accountable persons’

Some of the new enforcement powers of APRA relate to the role of the ‘accountable person’, as discussed last time. APRA will now be able to disqualify an accountable person in an ADI or in a subsidiary, or disqualify an accountable person in relation to a class or classes of ADIs or their subsidiaries (see Schedule 1, item 1, section 37J of the draft Bill).

In assessing whether or not an accountable person has breached the BEAR requirements, APRA will consider information provided by the ADI concerning accountability responsibilities within that ADI.

New powers relating to ADIs

In serious cases, APRA will be able to exercise its power to seek civil penalties where an ADI has failed to:

  • comply with BEAR accountability obligations (see Schedule 1, item 1, section 37 of the draft Bill);
  • meet personnel obligations, including the requirement to ensure operations are covered by an accountable person (see Schedule 1, item 1, section 37D of the draft Bill);
  • register an accountable person and give APRA an accountability statement for that person; (see Schedule 1, item 1, sections 37F and 37HA of the draft Bill);
  • provide APRA an accountability map (see Schedule 1, item 1, sections 37F and 37FB of the draft Bill), and
  • defer the remuneration of accountable persons as required under BEAR (see Schedule 1, item 1, section 37E of the draft Bill).

Importantly, both ADIs and ‘accountable person’ will be prohibited from indemnifying themselves against the financial consequences (such as fines or civil penalties) that may result from breach of the BEAR (see Schedule 1, item 1, section 37KB of the draft Bill).

New examination and investigation powers

As well as enforcement powers, BEAR also provides APRA with new examination and investigation powers (see Schedule 2, item 4, section 61A of the draft Bill). This includes a requirement that a person to appear before an investigator where there is a reasonable belief that the person has information relevant to an investigation. Refusal to appear before the investigation, to answer questions, or to swear that information is provided is true, will be a criminal offence.

 

More to explorer

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

person wearing foo dog costume

Obligations of Energy Retailers Regarding Best Offer Information

Energy retailers in Victoria have specific obligations under the Energy Retail Code of Practice to provide clear information to customers about their ‘best offer’ – that is, the plan that would minimize the customer‘s energy costs based on their usage history. The objective is to ensure small customers can easily understand whether they are on the retailer‘s best plan for them and how to access the retailer‘s best offer if not. One of the significant challenges in the energy sector (as in banking and elsewhere) is that customers

low angle photo of sydney opera house australia

Guide to the National Energy Retail Rules

The National Energy Retail Rules (NERR) are a set of rules that govern the sale and supply of electricity and gas by retailers to consumers in Australia, alongside the related National Energy Retail Law (NERL). The NERR came into effect on 1 July 2012 in Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Commonwealth. South Australia followed on 1 February 2013, New South Wales on 1 July 2013, and Queensland on 1 July 2015. The NERR do not yet apply in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *