AUSTRAC’s risk assessment: three areas where you may need to step up your compliance program

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) has just released a report (12 July) Securities & derivatives sector: money laundering and terrorism financing risk assessment revealing the vulnerabilities of the securities and derivatives sector with regards to financial crime.

We recently took at AUSTRAC’s advice on the risk management obligations of businesses. We have also looked at the compliance obligations of those who trade in OTC derivatives.

risk assessment

By Dr. Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter

Today we review AUSTRAC’s assessment with one focus; in which areas are businesses still falling short in meeting their obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) framework.

AUSTRAC’s Findings

AUSTRAC’s report used three key sources in developing its risk assessment:

  • Analysis of suspicious matter reports (SMRs), as well as other AUSTRAC intelligence
  • Reports and intelligence from other government agencies
  • Feedback from entities within the sector, industry associations and industry experts.

The key findings were:

  • The risk of criminal behaviour in the securities and derivatives sector is rated at the high end of ‘medium’.
  • Fraud, including fraud which is cyber-enabled, was the highest reported threat to the sector, with many customer emails and trading accounts being hacked.
  • Money laundering, insider trading and market manipulation were the next highest areas of criminal behaviour
  • Tax evasion (2%) and terrorism financing (1%) were the least reported threats.

Areas where improvement is needed

AUSTRAC emphasises that it expects businesses to read the report and, check that AML/CTF procedures and arrangements are compliant. AUSTRAC has committed to following (p6). Listed below are three areas where organisations have work to do.

(1) Insufficient SMR

Under section 41 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, designated organisations are required to submit ‘suspicious matter reports’ (SMRs) to AUSTRAC when certain suspicious circumstances apply.

However, over the two-year sample period used in the construction of AUSTRAC’s assessment, 60 per cent of participants did not submit an SMR to AUSTRAC.

While it is possible that there was no suspicious activity to report, this seems unlikely. It is more likely that some of the non-reporting is because organisations do not have appropriate mechanisms in place to capture the suspicious behaviour.

For further information, see our discussion of risk management programs under the AML/CTF Framework.

(2) White labelling

White labelling occurs when businesses facilitate access to a trading platform despite not being a customer. The risk here is that “Poorly developed agreements or contracts that do not clearly indicate which entities are responsible for AML/CTF obligations significantly undermine the AML/CTF framework.” (p5). Organisations need to be aware that they cannot outsource their regulatory obligations under the AML/CTF framework.

(3) Foreign-owned organisations unaware of their obligations.

45 % of the ASX market is owned by foreign entities. 31% of suspicious transactions related to the behaviour of entities in foreign jurisdictions. Any organisation operating in Australian markets need to be aware of their legal obligations when operating here.

To see other areas for improving compliance read the full report.

If you think we could be of assistance in developing appropriate risk management procedures and mechanisms, please don’t hesitate to get in contact.

More to explorer

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

person wearing foo dog costume

Obligations of Energy Retailers Regarding Best Offer Information

Energy retailers in Victoria have specific obligations under the Energy Retail Code of Practice to provide clear information to customers about their ‘best offer’ – that is, the plan that would minimize the customer‘s energy costs based on their usage history. The objective is to ensure small customers can easily understand whether they are on the retailer‘s best plan for them and how to access the retailer‘s best offer if not. One of the significant challenges in the energy sector (as in banking and elsewhere) is that customers

low angle photo of sydney opera house australia

Guide to the National Energy Retail Rules

The National Energy Retail Rules (NERR) are a set of rules that govern the sale and supply of electricity and gas by retailers to consumers in Australia, alongside the related National Energy Retail Law (NERL). The NERR came into effect on 1 July 2012 in Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Commonwealth. South Australia followed on 1 February 2013, New South Wales on 1 July 2013, and Queensland on 1 July 2015. The NERR do not yet apply in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *