Three reminders for exempt businesses from the latest AER Compliance Report  

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

The Australian Energy Regulator’s (AER) Quarterly Compliance Report: National Electricity and Gas Laws 1 January – 31 March 2018 was recently released.[1] It canvasses a range of compliance activities carried out by the AER over that three-month period, including compliance for wholesale market participants such as retailers, distributors and generators.  Rather than market participants, our focus today is on the AER’s compliance activities with respect to businesses operating under network or retail exemptions. In particular, we look at compliance lessons for Embedded Network Operators (ENOs) and exempt businesses using power purchase agreements (PPAs).

exempt businesses

By Dr Drew Donnelly, Regulatory Specialist, Compliance Quarter.
  1. Advising embedded network customers that seek to go ‘on market’

The AER observes that embedded networks are now expected to be fully in compliance with the power of choice reforms requiring the appointment of Embedded Network Managers (ENMs) in certain states and territories. AER comments that where ENMs are required to be appointed and have not been, the AER will consider taking steps to revoke an ENO’s network exemption.[2]

Problematically, AER has identified a phenomenon of market retailers being unwilling to provide offers to embedded network customers who do not have a Network Metering Identifier (NMI).[3] This is primarily a compliance issue for retailers; it is the responsibility of the market retailer to request the ENM to create a child NMI. However, this also instructive for ENOs. An embedded network customer may, based on retailer refusal, approach the ENO seeking an NMI. In that case, an ENO should contact the retailer advising them of the appropriate procedure (and, if an ENM does not currently exist, begin the process for appointing or becoming one).

  1. Ensuring that MSATS data is correct for child connection points

The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) has identified discrepancies between wholesale metering data at transmission nodes and the sum of metering data for downstream connection points.[4] This suggests that participants are either incorrectly entering NMI data relating to regional electricity loss (captured in ‘Transmission Node Identities’ or ‘TNIs’) or it has not been updated where necessary. AER identified Local Network Service Providers (LNSPs) as the culprits. So, what does this have to do with ENOs?

For those ENOs who have also been appointed as ENMs, it is their responsibility to ensure that the data relating to ‘on-market’ child connection points is accurate and up-to-date. I.e. they act as the LNSP for those child connection points. This includes responsibility for TNIs which capture regional electricity loss. All ENMs must have a procedure in place for ensuring that they have accurate and up-to-date TNIs for connection points in their embedded networks. Up-to-date TNIs can be requested from AEMO.

  1. Metering obligations of Solar Energy Businesses

An increasingly popular renewable energy arrangement is the solar Power Purchase Agreement (solar PPA). This involves a third party installing solar photovoltaic (PV) panels on a customer’s premises from which that customer is sold the energy produced. Vendors of solar PV are eligible for both retail authorisation and network exemptions.

The AER observed that some solar PV businesses are unsure of their metering obligations.[5] AER confirmed that solar PV with PPAs  (and holding a valid exemption) are not subject to the metering rules in the National Electricity Rules and associated Metrology Procedure. Rather, through their network exemptions they are simply subject to the condition that meters comply with the requirements of the National Measurement Act. Further information, including pattern approval requirements and pattern approval application forms, are available on the National Measurement Institute’s website.

 

[1] See https://www.aer.gov.au/wholesale-markets/compliance-reporting/quarterly-compliance-report-january-march-2018.

[2] See compliance report, p15.

[3] See compliance report, p16.

[4] See compliance report, p10.

[5] See compliance report, p17.

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *