The Essential Services Commission (Vic) Minimum Feed-In Tariff review 2022/23

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

On 2 December 2021, the Essential Services Commission (ESC) released its draft decision for minimum feed-in tariffs for solar exporters. It is anticipated that the figures in the draft will apply from 1 July 2022.

This short article will discuss the proposed tariffs and provide a brief summary of the reasoning behind the adjusted tariff. We will also look at how the ESC calculates the tariff.

The New Proposed Tariffs:

The draft minimum feed-in tariffs have been calculated the same way as previous reviews (discussed below). The draft minimum feed-in tariffs are as follows:

The draft minimum flat feed-in tariff for 2022–23 is 5.2 cents per kWh. This is 22 percent lower than the minimum rate for 2021–22. The draft time-varying feed-in tariffs are also lower than for 2021–22.

* Feed-in tariffs of solar customers registered for GST are subject to GST. Most residential solar owners are not registered for GST and GST will not apply to their feed-in tariffs.  

The Reason for the Drop:

The primary reason for the drop in feed-in tariffs is due to the lower forecast for wholesale electricity prices during daylight hours (2022-23). There has been a significant decrease in wholesale prices (daylight) due to the increase in exported solar. The ESC also cited a general drop in demand, due to the effects of the pandemic and an increase in rooftop solar installations. The draft also cited the ongoing investment in generation capacity as a factor in driving wholesale electricity prices lower.

The ESC also noted that the feed-in tariff should not be compared to retail rates as solar exporters do not incur the same expenses as retail providers. They noted that retailers have to ensure that they are able to cover their wholesale costs, the costs associated with hedging, the cost of transporting electricity, and their compliance and day-to-day running costs.

How does The ESC Calculate Feed-in Tariffs:

The ESC estimates the price that a retailer would pay if they bought electricity in the National Energy Market (NEM) from the large generators. When setting the minimum feed-in tariff, the ESC they start by looking at the prices that large-scale generators receive in the NEM.

The ESC then add amounts to account for avoided market fees (of the solar exporters), energy saved by not transporting power for long distances and the additional environmental benefits of green energy.

The Factors Considered by the ESC in Setting the Feed-in Tariff:

The primary factor used by the ESC to set the feed-in tariff is time block structure. They determine a flat feed-in tariff and minimum time-varying tariffs:

Table 2.1 – Time block structure for the time-varying feed-in tariff  

Period  Weekday  Weekend
Overnight10pm-7am  10pm-7am  
Day  7am-3pm, 9pm-10pm  7am-10pm  
Early Evening  3pm-9pm  n/a  

The ESC also consider other factors, such as the avoided human health costs attributable to a reduction in air pollution. The factors above show the ‘tweaking’ process that has the effect of raising and lowering the feed-in tariff calculations.

The ESC is conducting a delicate balancing exercise in setting the minimum feed-in tariffs. They incorporate environmental benefit considerations with the commercial viability factors of retailers. A full copy of the draft can be found at:


More to explorer

notes on board

How to Manage Multiple Compliance Deadlines: A Case Study

Compliance managers in the energy sector are constantly juggling a large work load with competing deadlines. Managing time effectively is a core skill for compliance managers. In this article, we will present a hypothetical case study of a compliance manager in an energy retailer who has to juggle multiple compliance tasks and deadlines, and how they can use some strategies and tools to manage their workload and prioritise effectively. We will also share some insights and tips from Compliance Quarter,

laptop on table top

How to Avoid Compliance Risks by Effective Communication: A Case Study

Compliance managers in the energy sector face many challenges in ensuring that their businesses comply with the regulatory framework. One of the most common and frustrating situations is when their advice is ignored or overridden by senior management or other stakeholders, exposing the business to potential compliance risks and penalties. In this article, we will present a hypothetical case study of a compliance manager in an energy retailer who faced this scenario and how it affected the business outcomes. We

Contemporary design of multifamily living houses. Modern luxury apartments buildings.

Modernising Electricity Regulation: The AES Framework and Embedded Networks in Western Australia

Background The existing licensing framework overseeing the sale and supply of electricity in Western Australia (WA) has struggled to adapt to the rapid expansion of emerging and atypical electricity business models in recent years. To address this, in 2019, the then Minister for Energy commissioned Energy Policy WA to assess the regulatory framework in Western Australia. In 2020, Energy Policy WA initiated consultations on a proposed regulatory framework for various categories of ‘alternative electricity services’ called the Alternative Electricity Services

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *