Shorter maximum timeframes for smart meter installation?

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

The Federal Government announced on 21 February that it has submitted a rule change request to the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC), asking for a maximum timeframe for smart meter installations (see

smart meter installation

Photo by jesse orrico on Unsplash

In today’s article, we explain the background and future process for this change.

Smart Meter Installation – Background

With few exceptions, where a new connection to the National Energy Market is set up, or where an existing meter needs replacing, a retailer (through its Metering Coordinator) must replace that meter with a smart meter (National Electricity Rules, 7.8.3).

A smart meter (also known as an ‘advanced’ meter or a ‘type 4’ meter) is a device that digitally measures energy use. Energy data is sent to the retailer automatically, without the need for the meter to be manually read by a meter reader. Other mechanisms included within a smart meter allow for:

  • remote switching power on or off;
  • measuring power quality at the premises;
  • customer monitoring of energy use;
  • notifying the distributor when the power goes out.

While there was previously a requirement to replace new meters within six days, under the current iteration of the rules there is no maximum time limit.

The roll-out of smart meters is one way in which the Government seeks to reduce energy costs for consumers as they allow consumers to keep a closer eye on their energy bill, and retailers to reduce the cost of reading energy usage.

The Federal Government considers that, without a maximum time limit, retailers may be taking longer than is necessary to upgrade the meters.

The Rule Change process

The Federal Government does not have the power to change the National Electricity Rules itself. This is a decision for the AEMC and it will follow the following process:

  • Initial assessment of the proposal. The proponent of the rule change request (who can be anyone) must, in their application, make a statement as to the nature and scope of the issue and how it relates to the National Electricity Objective. That Objective, according to section seven of the National Electricity Law, is to promote efficient investment in, and efficient operation and use of, electricity services for the long-term interests of consumers of electricity with respect to:
  • price, quality, safety and reliability and security of supply of electricity;
  • the reliability, safety and security of the national electricity system.
  • Once the AEMC is satisfied, it will commence the rule change process, seeking submissions on the request;
  • The AEMC will take those submissions into account, and then, if it considers it appropriate, make a draft determination;
  • Stakeholders, if they wish, can then lodge a submission on that draft rule determination;
  • The AEMC can then publish a final rule determination if it considers it appropriate to do so.

We will keep you posted on the progression of any draft rule change and when you will be able to make submissions on it. For any additional advice, please get in touch with us by clicking here.


More to explorer

Flinders Street Station Aerial

ESC Guide to embedded networks

The Essential Services Commision of Victoria has published a variety of resources for operators of embedded networks on its website including a

a high-voltage electricity pylons against blue sky and clouds power line electric post

iSelect’s $8.5 Million Fine

The Federal Court of Australia has ordered that iSelect pay $8.5 million in penalties for making false or misleading representations about its

Entrepreneur working with bills

Retailer Billing Rule Change

The AEMC has released a consultation paper on the ‘Bill contents and billing requirements’ Rule Change Request made by the Federal Energy

I went through Compliance Quarter to get a privacy statement for my website. The process was very easy and the template that I received was customised to my needs.

Eve Barylka, Business Owner

Their communication was responsive and always clear. I would rate their service and quality of work higher if more than 5 stars was possible!

Steven Nelson, Business Manager