Should You Outsource Compliance?

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

In providing legal, regulatory and compliance services, we see a variety of approaches towards compliance and enable clients to outsource compliance to varying degrees. This article is not intended to argue the overall culture a business should create around compliance (we did that in a fantastic recent article – click here) but investigate some of the options for how a company can resource and manage compliance.

outsource compliance

By Stephen Findley, Relationship Manager, Compliance Quarter

Broadly speaking, a company can operate its compliance management in three ways:

  • Fully in-house – Source, hire and build a team dedicated to compliance
  • Fully outsourced – utilise an individual, team or company of outsourced professionals
  • Blended solution – combine in-house and outsourced

And the choices here can often come down to the preferences and experiences of the individuals involved, in addition to the position of the company in question.

Outsource Compliance – The Startup

The start-up company might be more likely to consider outsourced or a blended solution to bring in expertise on an ad-hoc or part-time basis to match cash flow considerations. We’ve worked with a number of startup electricity retailers where they’ll combine our services with a board member, usually general manager or an operations director to blend the compliance workload – and we have developed software tools to help make this a seamless process.

Outsource Compliance – Growth and Expansion

As a company grows, it will usually hire more staff and acquire more customers. This generally leads to increased risk and the compliance spend/function should grow accordingly. We’ve helped some of our clients to identify and hire compliance staff in addition to providing training and helping them to manage the transition to in-house. Some companies will grow to a size beyond our capacity and it is in the interest of both parties to communicate this accordingly. A responsible compliance outsourced function should be upfront about this, the long-term negative effects far outweigh the short-term benefits of maintaining revenue.

Where geography allows we have also provided part-time in-house services to complement the work we do from an outsourced position and this sits well with certain clients looking for a regular personal relationship.

Compliance Technology & The Blended Solution

Technology is also lending a hand rapidly. With the developments in software, companies no longer need to rely on binders full of documents or Excel spreadsheets. Our work with financial services companies and energy retailers has been about using technology to increase the efficiency in compliance and the benefit for companies is that it will reduce the overall costs of compliance whilst also reducing the risk when managed correctly.

The blended solution doesn’t always refer to the staffing approach entirely. An employed compliance manager using dedicated compliance software could be considered a blended solution that reduces some of the risk by allowing the company to take advantage of software solutions that are tried and tested, plus come with support. Plus all of the documentation and management of compliance does not need to sit with one individual – good software can provide reports or update a board on the work being done in compliance and help make transitions smoother.

Our online solution to help companies – the Compliance HUB

At this, and indeed, anytime compliance could be kept outsourced. Companies might like an outsourced function that relies on the expertise of a team as opposed to relying on one or two individuals. In some instances, it could be the cost and risk associated with hiring full-time employees – with the alternative option the company does not have to worry about holidays, sick pay and the associated costs and mechanisms in place to provide cover during these periods.

If your GM has a strong compliance background and your company is small, then they may be able to effectively manage compliance with the support of some good software or regular access to regulatory experts. However, this might not be adequate and taking the time to assess your compliance requirements regularly is at the heart of taking a flexible and pragmatic approach.


With much of the world considering or using outsourced services, it is crucial to select the right vendor to provide support – the reputational risk and fines will likely far exceed the cost if something is not done correctly and compliance culture is something that has been covered through the Royal Commission, the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica data scandal and a host of other more localised stories.

Some of the best software as a service (SaaS) solutions come from times when a problem is set out, addressed and a fix is attempted. Context matters here and a compliance software solution should include the expertise of those with relevant experience.

There really is no right or wrong solution and it’s often the companies that do not apply due care and attention to this important aspect of their business that run into trouble. If you want to discuss the management of compliance within your business, click here to book a call with us or email the team by clicking here.

More to explorer

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

person wearing foo dog costume

Obligations of Energy Retailers Regarding Best Offer Information

Energy retailers in Victoria have specific obligations under the Energy Retail Code of Practice to provide clear information to customers about their ‘best offer’ – that is, the plan that would minimize the customer‘s energy costs based on their usage history. The objective is to ensure small customers can easily understand whether they are on the retailer‘s best plan for them and how to access the retailer‘s best offer if not. One of the significant challenges in the energy sector (as in banking and elsewhere) is that customers

low angle photo of sydney opera house australia

Guide to the National Energy Retail Rules

The National Energy Retail Rules (NERR) are a set of rules that govern the sale and supply of electricity and gas by retailers to consumers in Australia, alongside the related National Energy Retail Law (NERL). The NERR came into effect on 1 July 2012 in Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Commonwealth. South Australia followed on 1 February 2013, New South Wales on 1 July 2013, and Queensland on 1 July 2015. The NERR do not yet apply in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *