Notifiable Data Breaches: Draft Resources Released

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

Last Friday the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) released draft resources to help businesses comply with the Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme.

Under the NDS scheme, organisations covered by the Privacy Act are required to notify individuals if their personal information is involved in a data breach that is likely to result in serious harm. This will be an important area of compliance for all APP entities.

The resources published on Friday cover:

• Entities covered by the NDB scheme
• Notifying individuals about an eligible data breach
• Identifying eligible data breaches
• The Australian Information Commissioner’s role in the NDB scheme.

This is the first in a series of posts looking at the NDB scheme. In this post, we will examine the definition of a Notifiable Data Breach based on the draft reference material.

What is a Notifiable Data Breach?

There are two elements to the test of a Notifiable Data Breach. The first is that personal information held by an organisation must have been lost or subject to unauthorised access or subject to unauthorised disclosure. The second is that the breach must be likely to result in serious harm to affected individuals.

Unauthorised access occurs when personal information is accessed by someone who is not permitted to have access. This may include access by unauthorised employees, contractors and third-parties.

Unauthorised disclosure occurs when an entity makes personal information available or visible to outsiders. This may include unauthorised disclosures by employees.

Loss refers to the accidental or inadvertent loss of personal information in circumstances where it is likely that unauthorised access or disclosure will occur. Loss may include accidental loss of storage devices on public transport by an employee, as an example.

‘Under the NDB scheme, if personal information is lost in circumstances where subsequent unauthorised access to or disclosure of the information is unlikely, there is no eligible data breach (s 26WE(2)(b)(ii)).’

When is Serious Harm Likely?

For the purpose of the NDB scheme, serious harm will be found where from the ‘perspective of a reasonable person, the data breach would be likely to result in serious harm to an individual whose personal information was part of the data breach.’

A reasonable person in this test is in the position of the entity (rather than the individual whose personal information was the subject of the data breach). Such a reasonable person is deemed to be properly informed.

Harm is said to include physical, psychological, emotional, financial, or reputational harm. Clearly, an example may include the loss of credit card and other financial details that would allow a third party to cause financial harm.

The NDB scheme includes a non-exhaustive list of ‘relevant matters’ that may assist entities to assess the likelihood that there has been serious harm. We will look in depth at these in a future post.

What should Businesses Do to Comply?

Businesses should examine (and consider contributing to) the draft resources. If you have feedback on the draft resources, please send it to consultations@oaic.gov.au before 14 July, 2017.

The NDB scheme will come into effect on 22 February 2018. Compliance Quarter will be developing a range of tools to assist clients in their compliance with the NDB scheme over the coming months. If these are of interest to you, contact us.

 

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *