New energy zones identified in New South Wales

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

New energy zones

By Anne Wardell, Compliance Quarter. 

The New South Wales Government (government) has lodged a submission with the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) in relation to AEMO’s Integrated System Plan (ISP). The ISP was recommended by the Independent Review into the Future Security of the NEM (Finkel Review).

The first ISP is expected to be delivered in June 2018 and AEMO has indicated that it will, ‘deliver a strategic infrastructure development plan, based on sound engineering and economics, which can facilitate an orderly energy system transition under a range of scenarios. This ISP will particularly consider:

  • What makes a successful renewable energy zone (REZ) and, if REZs are identified, how to develop them.
  • Transmission development options’. (Source: AEMO ISP page)

The government submission was released in March 2018 and it is important reading for all energy users in New South Wales as it identifies ten energy zones in NSW with three of them being considered as Potential Priority Energy Zones. The Executive Summary provides the following overview of the process undertaken in preparing the submission:

‘Independent geospatial analysis overlaying 25 NSW data layers has identified the potential for ten Energy Zones in NSW, including three potential priority Energy Zones in the state’s New England, Central-West and South-West regions, as shown in Figure 1. These locations benefit from outstanding energy resources, have reduced environmental and planning constraints, are close to existing transmission and distribution infrastructure and load centers, and align with the Government’s regional growth priorities, developed in consultation with regional communities. Combined, the three priority Energy Zones could unlock 77,000 megawatts (MW) of new generation capacity. Complemented by emerging energy technologies, energy efficiency, and demand response, this would be more than enough generation to meet future energy needs’.

New energy zones

 

In determining what areas would be the best locations for potential energy zones, the submission used the following key criteria:

▪ Energy resource and geography – the level of solar, wind and bioenergy resources and other factors impacting generation capacity in particular locations, including site slope, slope aspect, site elevation and geology.
▪ Cost-effectiveness – proximity to existing transmission infrastructure and load centres, encouraging efficient investment and limiting energy losses.
▪ Environmental, heritage and land-use considerations – potential land-use conflict or impacts on sites of environmental and heritage value, including Biophysical Strategic Agricultural Land.
▪ Contribution to a strong and diversified economy – NSW Government regional development priorities, developed in consultation with regional communities, as well as local and state-wide economic growth goals.
▪ Investor and community support – proximity to existing energy project pipeline where investors have demonstrated an interest in particular locations, and proximity to regions with community support for renewable energy projects, as identified through the NSW Regional Plans.

Figure 3 below sets out Priority Energy Zones, Solar Energy Zones, and Wind Energy Zones;

New energy zones

Ultimately the AEMO will decide where the new energy zones will be situated. Whilst acknowledging this, the government submission notes that:

‘The Government acknowledges AEMO’s central role in developing an Integrated System Plan and identifying locations for Energy Zones across the NEM, from an energy system perspective. However, the NSW Government is well-placed to identify the best locations for NSW Energy Zones from a strategic cross-sector and state-wide perspective, accounting for a broader range of relevant considerations’ (at page 7).

Further information is available on the AEMO ISP page and the NSW Government Planning & Environment, Resources & Energy page.

If you would like to discuss this in more detail please contact the team here at Compliance Quarter by clicking here.

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *