New Consultation Seeks Input on Energy Price Regulation for Embedded Networks

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

The New South Wales Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) has released an industry consultation paper as part of its review into regulating energy prices in embedded networks across the state.

Embedded networks refer to private energy networks that serve multiple customers, like apartment buildings or retirement communities. They currently face little regulation on pricing compared to standard energy customers.

The paper notes there are two key issues up for discussion:

  • What is the right level of customer protection? IPART’s preliminary view is that maximum prices should be lower than the regulated Default Market Offer that caps prices for standard energy deals. This recognizes that embedded network customers can’t shop around for better rates.
  • How should maximum prices be set? IPART has proposed 7 criteria for assessing pricing approaches, like ensuring costs are recovered and incentivizing efficiency. Stakeholders are invited to suggest methodologies and provide input on specific considerations like metering, customer types, and enforcement.

The consultation is part of a broader review following concerning findings from a NSW Parliamentary Inquiry last year. The Inquiry revealed cases of exorbitant bills for embedded network customers up to $9,700 over 14 months.

IPART Chair Peter Boxall said “There are currently few limits on [embedded networks’] prices, and it is difficult for individual customers in embedded networks to switch retailers if they are unhappy with their supplier.”

The paper also seeks feedback on whether new hot water and chilled water embedded networks should be banned altogether, though notes they may enable innovation.

Finally, embedded network operators, retailers, and other stakeholders are asked to provide details to inform the review, such as current customer numbers, prices, costs and metering arrangements.

Submissions are open until September 11, 2023. IPART encourages consumers and industry members to have their say to shape the outcomes of this important review.

More to explorer

Autumn leaves falling with copy space on black background

Avoiding Compliance Atrophy: The Critical Role of Assurance Reviews for Growing Energy Retailers

As energy retailers expand their customer base and operations, ensuring ongoing compliance with regulatory obligations can become increasingly challenging. A key risk is “compliance atrophy” – where initially compliant documents, processes and systems slowly deteriorate and waste away over time if not regularly monitored and reviewed. What is compliance atrophy? Compliance atrophy is typically a result of documents, processes and systems being ‘updated’ or ‘reworded’ to reflect changes in focus for the business and input from other stakeholders including marketing

person holding debit card

AER payment difficulty framework review

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is conducting a review of the consumer protections available under the National Energy Customer Framework (NECF) for those experiencing payment difficulties. On 14 May 2024, the AER released an issues paper for consultation. The review is driven by the commitment in Action 8 of the ‘Towards Energy Equity’ strategy in which the AER committed to considering whether improvements could be made to the NECF to ensure that consumers experiencing payment difficulties are identified early, engaged

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *