A braided network of reviews and investigations into the Murray-Darling river basin

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

On 31 July, the Prime Minister requested the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) to consider conducting a nation-wide compliance review (https://www.mdba.gov.au/media/mr/basin-wide-compliance-review). This is a response to allegations of illegal diversion of water in New South Wales (NSW) and official impropriety.

At the same time, there are at least five other reviews or possible investigations that have begun or are being considered which relate to management of the basin including the involvement of the Commonwealth Auditor-General and the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC).

murray darling basin authority

By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter

In today’s article, we untangle these different reviews and potential investigations, describing their objectives and how they relate to each other.

Background: The Basin Plan and the latest allegations

The Murray-Darling basin is an agricultural area spanning NSW, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), capturing a massive river system, the most significant rivers in that system being the Murray and the Darling.

According to the Australian Constitution the management of water is a matter for states and territories. In order to manage this resource in an environmentally sustainable way, a ‘Basin Plan’ was agreed to by the states and ACT in 2012. Compliance with that plan is managed by the MDBA.

On 24 July, on ABC’s Four Corners, serious allegations were raised regarding compliance with the plan, including that changes to river rules by the NSW Government, resulted in water purchased by the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder (CEWH) being pumped into private water channels.

The CEWH manages water on behalf of the federal government, acquired through national water reforms, including the Basin Plan.

The five (so far) likely reviews and investigations

(1) The MDBA Basin-wide Compliance Review

This proposed national review would be wide-ranging and would consider the legislative, policy and practical implementation of compliance and enforcement across the basin.

The review would look at the effectiveness of existing rules and laws, measurement and monitoring, and governance.

The MDBA would work with independent experts in conducting the review.

Note, that the scope of the review will need to be agreed to by state and territory ministers.

(2) ANAO Audit of National Partnership Agreements

The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) is already carrying out an audit of the monitoring and payment arrangements under National Partnership Agreements . This is due in Autumn 2018.

(3) ANAO Extension on Audit

The Auditor-General has now extended the scope of the audit outlined above to include how the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources is monitoring the performance of NSW under the National Partnership Agreement on Implementing Water Reform.

The Auditory-General is considering releasing a report on the outcome of this audit later this year.

(4) The independent NSW Government- commissioned review

The NSW Government has commissioned an independent review led by Mr Ken Matthews AO, former foundation chair and chief executive of the National Water Commission. The review will cover “all allegations raised in the broadcast that involve the responsibilities of the Department of Primary Industries-Water and any of its employees”.

This review will also be able to make any additional recommendations that may arise from the investigation, including deficiencies relating to compliance and enforcement of water laws.

An interim report is due by the 31 August 2017.

(5) A possible ICAC investigation

The allegations have been referred to ICAC which investigates corrupt behaviour of public officials. After an initial assessment, it will be up to ICAC to launch an investigation if it wishes.

If it uncovers behaviour that it considers to be illegal or criminal, ICAC will pass on that information for possible legal action or prosecution.


More to explorer

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

person wearing foo dog costume

Obligations of Energy Retailers Regarding Best Offer Information

Energy retailers in Victoria have specific obligations under the Energy Retail Code of Practice to provide clear information to customers about their ‘best offer’ – that is, the plan that would minimize the customer‘s energy costs based on their usage history. The objective is to ensure small customers can easily understand whether they are on the retailer‘s best plan for them and how to access the retailer‘s best offer if not. One of the significant challenges in the energy sector (as in banking and elsewhere) is that customers

low angle photo of sydney opera house australia

Guide to the National Energy Retail Rules

The National Energy Retail Rules (NERR) are a set of rules that govern the sale and supply of electricity and gas by retailers to consumers in Australia, alongside the related National Energy Retail Law (NERL). The NERR came into effect on 1 July 2012 in Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Commonwealth. South Australia followed on 1 February 2013, New South Wales on 1 July 2013, and Queensland on 1 July 2015. The NERR do not yet apply in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *