A braided network of reviews and investigations into the Murray-Darling river basin

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

On 31 July, the Prime Minister requested the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) to consider conducting a nation-wide compliance review (https://www.mdba.gov.au/media/mr/basin-wide-compliance-review). This is a response to allegations of illegal diversion of water in New South Wales (NSW) and official impropriety.

At the same time, there are at least five other reviews or possible investigations that have begun or are being considered which relate to management of the basin including the involvement of the Commonwealth Auditor-General and the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC).

murray darling basin authority

By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter

In today’s article, we untangle these different reviews and potential investigations, describing their objectives and how they relate to each other.

Background: The Basin Plan and the latest allegations

The Murray-Darling basin is an agricultural area spanning NSW, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), capturing a massive river system, the most significant rivers in that system being the Murray and the Darling.

According to the Australian Constitution the management of water is a matter for states and territories. In order to manage this resource in an environmentally sustainable way, a ‘Basin Plan’ was agreed to by the states and ACT in 2012. Compliance with that plan is managed by the MDBA.

On 24 July, on ABC’s Four Corners, serious allegations were raised regarding compliance with the plan, including that changes to river rules by the NSW Government, resulted in water purchased by the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder (CEWH) being pumped into private water channels.

The CEWH manages water on behalf of the federal government, acquired through national water reforms, including the Basin Plan.

The five (so far) likely reviews and investigations

(1) The MDBA Basin-wide Compliance Review

This proposed national review would be wide-ranging and would consider the legislative, policy and practical implementation of compliance and enforcement across the basin.

The review would look at the effectiveness of existing rules and laws, measurement and monitoring, and governance.

The MDBA would work with independent experts in conducting the review.

Note, that the scope of the review will need to be agreed to by state and territory ministers.

(2) ANAO Audit of National Partnership Agreements

The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) is already carrying out an audit of the monitoring and payment arrangements under National Partnership Agreements . This is due in Autumn 2018.

(3) ANAO Extension on Audit

The Auditor-General has now extended the scope of the audit outlined above to include how the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources is monitoring the performance of NSW under the National Partnership Agreement on Implementing Water Reform.

The Auditory-General is considering releasing a report on the outcome of this audit later this year.

(4) The independent NSW Government- commissioned review

The NSW Government has commissioned an independent review led by Mr Ken Matthews AO, former foundation chair and chief executive of the National Water Commission. The review will cover “all allegations raised in the broadcast that involve the responsibilities of the Department of Primary Industries-Water and any of its employees”.

This review will also be able to make any additional recommendations that may arise from the investigation, including deficiencies relating to compliance and enforcement of water laws.

An interim report is due by the 31 August 2017.

(5) A possible ICAC investigation

The allegations have been referred to ICAC which investigates corrupt behaviour of public officials. After an initial assessment, it will be up to ICAC to launch an investigation if it wishes.

If it uncovers behaviour that it considers to be illegal or criminal, ICAC will pass on that information for possible legal action or prosecution.

 

More to explorer

a high-voltage electricity pylons against blue sky and clouds power line electric post

New Rule from AEMC Allows Retailers to Defer Network Bills

The Australian Energy Market Commission (‘AEMC’) has just finalised a rule that will allow the majority of market energy retailers in Australia to defer network bills for 6 months. Here we explain this decision and what it means for retailers.

pylon

FCA proceedings commenced by the ACCC against Sumo

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia alleging that Sumo Power Pty Ltd (Sumo) made false or misleading representations to Victorian consumers in relation to its electricity plans.

I went through Compliance Quarter to get a privacy statement for my website. The process was very easy and the template that I received was customised to my needs.

Eve Barylka, Business Owner

Their communication was responsive and always clear. I would rate their service and quality of work higher if more than 5 stars was possible!

Steven Nelson, Business Manager