How does Australia compare to California when it comes to Electric Vehicle (EV) subsidies?

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

Last month, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) announced approval of $738 million worth of projects for electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure in California.[1] In today’s article, we briefly look at the projects that are being funded and compare this with the state-of-play in Australia for subsidised EV.

Electric Vehicle subsidies California streets

By Dr Drew Donnelly, Regulatory Specialist, Compliance Quarter

The CPUC approval

CPUC approved funding for the following projects:

  • San Diego Gas & Electric’s (SDG&E) Residential Charging Program ($137 million): This provides rebates for residential customers to install home charging stations;
  • SDG&E’s Residential Grid Integrated Rate: This would offer customer participating in the program above the option to enrol in an EV-only electricity rate that varies hourly based on day-ahead forecasts;
  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) Direct Current Fast Charging Make-Ready Program ($22 million). This would install ‘make-ready’ infrastructure at 52 sites supporting fast charging stations. ‘Make Ready’ infrastructure consists of the essential wiring and electrical apparatus for connecting charging stations to the grid;
  • PG&E’s FleetReady Program ($236 million): PG&E will install the ‘make-ready’ infrastructure for at least 700 sites to support the electrification of at least 6,500 medium- or heavy-duty vehicles.
  • Southern California Edison’s (SCE) Medium- and Heavy-Duty Infrastructure Program ($343 million), This will install the make-ready infrastructure in a minimum of 870 sites to support the electrification of at least 8,490 medium- or heavy-duty vehicles.
  • SCE’s Commercial Electric Vehicle Rate Design (no incremental costs): SCE will establish three new time-of-use rates for commercial customers with EV.

Of course, the overall goal of these measures is to move California towards a smaller carbon footprint in accordance with the 2015 Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act – Electric Vehicle subsidies are one way to do this. This legislation sets emissions reduction goals for California for 2030 and beyond with related responsibilities for state regulators such as CPUC. But more specifically, these measures are targeted at:

  • A recognition of the importance of ‘fast-charging’, which can charge EV in 20-30 minutes;
  • A recognition of the pollution caused by diesel vehicles and a consequent emphasis on subsidies for medium and heavy-use vehicles;
  • A recognition of inequality concerns with 25 per cent of the fast chargers to be placed in disadvantaged areas.

Australian Government Support for EV & Electric Vehicle subsidies

In Australia, there has been limited Government strategic support for EV at both the Commonwealth and State/Territory levels. Initiatives that have been implemented over the last year, at the Commonwealth level, include:

  • the Australian Renewable Energy Agency’s (ARENA) announcement of funding for a public participation program by Evenergi with the goal of increasing the amount of EV on Australia’s roads and boosting home solar and storage units. [2]
  • the Clean Energy Finance Corporation’s (CEFC) $100 million support through Macquarie Leasing to achieve a 7 per cent discount on financing for electric vehicles.[3]

The only significant strategic direction for Electric Vehicle subsidies at the state/territory level has been in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Earlier this year the ACT released its Transition to Zero Emissions Vehicles Action Plan 2018–21.[4] In this, the ACT sets out its support for EV in the ACT including:

  • No stamp duty on zero-emissions vehicle purchases;
  • A 20 per cent discount on zero-emissions annual vehicle registration;
  • Purchase of EV for the ACT government fleet.

Victoria has also introduced a registration discount for hybrid vehicles.[5]

It remains to be seen whether Commonwealth or State/Territory Government will introduce funding for significant EV infrastructure projects in the future.

Contact us if you’d like to discuss this article in more detail or if you would like the Compliance Quarter team to prepare a specific report for your business – click here.

[1] See

[2] See

[3] See

[4] See

[5] See

More to explorer

Autumn leaves falling with copy space on black background

Avoiding Compliance Atrophy: The Critical Role of Assurance Reviews for Growing Energy Retailers

As energy retailers expand their customer base and operations, ensuring ongoing compliance with regulatory obligations can become increasingly challenging. A key risk is “compliance atrophy” – where initially compliant documents, processes and systems slowly deteriorate and waste away over time if not regularly monitored and reviewed. What is compliance atrophy? Compliance atrophy is typically a result of documents, processes and systems being ‘updated’ or ‘reworded’ to reflect changes in focus for the business and input from other stakeholders including marketing

person holding debit card

AER payment difficulty framework review

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is conducting a review of the consumer protections available under the National Energy Customer Framework (NECF) for those experiencing payment difficulties. On 14 May 2024, the AER released an issues paper for consultation. The review is driven by the commitment in Action 8 of the ‘Towards Energy Equity’ strategy in which the AER committed to considering whether improvements could be made to the NECF to ensure that consumers experiencing payment difficulties are identified early, engaged

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *