Future Directions for Compliance in the Construction and Building Industry

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

On 27 April the Building Ministers’ forum (BMF) met to discuss recommendations in the final report ‘Building Confidence – Improving the effectiveness of compliance and enforcement systems for the building and construction industry across Australia’ (the Report).[1] In this article we look at some compliance and enforcement recommendations contained in the Report. This will be of interest to any business in Australia involved in construction or property development.

Compliance in Construction
Sydney Australia, 2 May 2018. Photo Connor
By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter.

Background to Compliance in Construction: The Report

The Report was independently commissioned by the BMF to independently assess compliance and enforcement problems within compliance in construction systems across Australia. It is aimed at strengthening implementation of the National Construction Code across jurisdictions (states and territories). A specific concern motivating the Report was the death of 71 people in the Grenfell Tower fire in London in June 2017, which has been attributed to highly combustible polyethylene cladding.[2]

The Recommendations

Some (but not all) of the key recommendations in the Report are listed below:

  • Each jurisdiction should require the following categories of registration for building practitioners:
    • Builder
    • Site or Project Manager
    • Building Surveyor
    • Building Inspector
    • Architect
    • Engineer
    • Designer/Draftsperson
    • Plumber
    • Fire Safety Practitioner.[3]
  • Requirements for registration and training should be consistent across states and territories;[4]
  • Each jurisdiction should establish formal mechanisms for collaborative partnership between regulators (whether state or local government) and private building surveyors (where they have been given and enforcement role);[5]
  • Each jurisdiction should give regulators broad monitoring powers and an ability to carry out compliance and enforcement action;[6]
  • Each jurisdiction should develop more pro-active audit strategies for the oversight of the construction of commercial buildings with annual reporting on outcomes;[7]
  • Each jurisdiction should implement measures to mitigate conflicts of interest in the responsibilities of private building surveyors. Private building surveyors often have both design and compliance responsibilities;[8]
  • Each jurisdiction should require that building approval documentation be prepared by certain types of registered practitioner in accordance with the National Construction Code;[9]
  • Independent third-party review should be introduced for certain designs and buildings;[10]
  • On-site inspections of building work should be introduced at identified notification stages.[11]

The BMF has provided in-principle support for the Report with Ministers to examine the Report’s findings and recommendations in detail and agreeing to discuss future directions at the next BMF meeting.

For more information, contact the team by clicking here.

[1] https://industry.gov.au/industry/IndustrySectors/buildingandconstruction/Documents/BMF-Communique—27-April-2018.pdf

[2] For the Report go to https://industry.gov.au/industry/IndustrySectors/buildingandconstruction/Documents/Shergold-and-Weir-Report—BMF-Expert-Assessment.pdf.

[3] The Report, p15.

[4] The Report, p17.

[5] The Report, p20.

[6] The Report, p21.

[7] The Report, p22.

[8] The Report, p25.

[9] The Report, p26.

[10] The Report, p27.

[11] The Report, p34.

More to explorer

ESC Review of the Payment Difficulty Framework

In January 2019, the payment difficulty framework commenced in Victoria to ensure that disconnection for non-payment is a last resort and that vulnerable customers are supported to pay for their energy usage. After two years of operation, the payment difficulty framework remains the most stringent customer protection framework in the country and has been considered a success by the Essential Services Commission (ESC). Now the ESC has commenced a review to evaluate and assess the operation of the framework in

Checking bills

Opportunity to shape energy bills of the future

On 2 September 2021, the AER has made a call for submissions on issues that will inform the AER Bill Contents and Billing Requirements Guideline (Guideline). Submissions are due by Wednesday, 22 September 2021.

The purpose of the Guideline is to provide retailers with guidance on preparing and issuing bills to make it easier for residential and small customers to understand billing information. The Guideline is a further step in the AER Strategic Plan 2020-2025 to improve consumer outcomes.

modern building with airplane against a blue sky

An Embedded Network (Guideline) Refresher

If you own, operate or control a private embedded network, you will need to ensure that you hold the exemptions you require. In all of the Eastern States of Australia, this will mean that you will need a network exemption issued pursuant to the AER’s Electricity NSP Registration Exemption Guideline (Network Exemption Guideline). In this post, we answer some of the most common questions when it comes to embedded networks that are regulated by the Network Exemption Guideline.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *