Environmental and sustainability claims: Draft guidance for business

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

The ACCC recently released draft guidance on environmental and sustainability claims to help businesses understand their obligations under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) and best practice when making such claims. The draft guidance aims to encourage truthful and accurate claims, decrease instances of ‘greenwashing’, and assist consumers in making informed choices.

Principles

The ACCC identified eight key principles for businesses to follow when making environmental and sustainability claims:

  1. Make accurate and truthful claims: All claims should be factually correct. Even if literally true, they should not create an misleading overall impression.
  2. Have evidence to back up your claims: Businesses should ensure they have clear evidence to substantiate any claims made, with independent, scientific evidence being the most credible. As stated in the guidance, “Making the research, evidence, or data that you are relying on easily accessible to consumers helps consumers to understand and trust your claims.”
  3. Don’t hide important information: Providing partial information risks misleading consumers by omitting key details. Consider the full lifecycle of products and services and be transparent. As noted in the guidance, “Small print shouldn’t hide the truth.”
  4. Explain any conditions or qualifications on your claims: Claims should clearly state any limitations or steps required for the benefit to be achieved. Theoretical benefits mislead if not explained.
  5. Avoid broad and unqualified claims: Broad claims can mislead by implying greater benefit than is the case. Qualify claims and use specifics. As stated in the guidance, “The risk of misleading consumers is reduced when you qualify your claims by expressly referring to a specific part or attribute of a product, service or business, and clearly outlining the specific environmental benefit being achieved.”
  6. Use clear and easy to understand language: Avoid scientific or technical language, and use ordinary meanings of words. As noted, “Most consumers do not have specialist scientific or industry knowledge.”
  7. Visual elements should not give the wrong impression: Colours, images, symbols and branding should not imply environmental benefits that do not exist. Consider the overall impression created.
  8. Be direct and open about your sustainability transition: Caution is urged around aspirational claims unless backed by actionable plans. As stated, “Be direct and open. Transitioning to a more sustainable business model takes time and is often not linear.”

The guidance provides examples of both good practice and potentially misleading claims for each principle. It also outlines the ACCC’s compliance and enforcement approach, including the use of Section 155 notices, substantiation notices, infringement notices and court action. Businesses risk significant penalties for contravening the ACL, with maximum fines per each breach of $50 million for corporations and $2.5 million for individuals, as well as up three times the gain or 30% revenue in the case of corporations.

Recommendations for energy sellers

Energy sellers are particularly susceptible to scrutiny in relation to the claims they make when it comes to the impact of their products and services on the environment. Energy sellers who claim to offer ‘renewable’ or ‘clean’ energy should carefully review their promotional and advertising material. Such claims need not be explicitly stated, they could be made by the overall impression of the relevant material.

Environmental and sustainability claims recommendations for Energy Sellers:

  • Ensure all environmental and sustainability claims are truthful, accurate and substantiated. Broad or exaggerated claims are more likely to mislead consumers and attract regulatory scrutiny.
  • Consider the overall impression created by your claims, and whether any further explanation or qualification is required. Look at all the information provided to consumers, including on websites, product packaging, in-store displays, advertisements, and via customer service staff.
  • Have a reasonable basis for making any claims about the future, for example have actionable plans and evidence to support claims about transitioning to renewable energy or emissions reductions. Regularly report on progress against these plans.
  • Avoid implying greater environmental benefit or scientific acceptance than is justified. Carefully explain the basis and any limitations of your claims.
  • Consider whether visual elements like colours, images, symbols, and logos could imply a benefit that does not exist. The overall impression created by these elements, combined with your claims, should not be misleading.
  • Use clear and simple language that is meaningful to ordinary consumers. Avoid overly technical terms or relying on complex scientific concepts unless clearly explained.
  • Make key supporting evidence and information easy for consumers to find and understand. Be open and transparent about your environmental impacts and credentials.
  • Consider getting independent third-party verification or certification for your environmental claims and credentials where possible. Explain the certification and any limits on its scope.
  • Regularly review your claims and supporting evidence to ensure it remains up to date and accurate. Be prepared to revise any claims that become outdated or cannot be substantiated.
  • Seek legal advice on your obligations under ACL and specific circumstances if unsure. Contravening the ACL can have serious consequences.

The draft guidance will provide an important reference for businesses looking to make accurate and trustworthy environmental claims. By following the recommended principles, businesses can build consumer trust in their environmental credentials and avoid misleading claims that risk attracting regulatory action. The ACCC is seeking feedback on the draft guidance until 15 September 2023.

More to explorer

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

person wearing foo dog costume

Obligations of Energy Retailers Regarding Best Offer Information

Energy retailers in Victoria have specific obligations under the Energy Retail Code of Practice to provide clear information to customers about their ‘best offer’ – that is, the plan that would minimize the customer‘s energy costs based on their usage history. The objective is to ensure small customers can easily understand whether they are on the retailer‘s best plan for them and how to access the retailer‘s best offer if not. One of the significant challenges in the energy sector (as in banking and elsewhere) is that customers

low angle photo of sydney opera house australia

Guide to the National Energy Retail Rules

The National Energy Retail Rules (NERR) are a set of rules that govern the sale and supply of electricity and gas by retailers to consumers in Australia, alongside the related National Energy Retail Law (NERL). The NERR came into effect on 1 July 2012 in Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Commonwealth. South Australia followed on 1 February 2013, New South Wales on 1 July 2013, and Queensland on 1 July 2015. The NERR do not yet apply in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *