Energy Retailer under Scrutiny for Banned Door-to-Door Sales

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

Victoria’s energy regulator has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from retailer 1st Energy Pty Limited following allegations that the company violated the Statewide ban on door-to-door energy sales. The ban, which took effect in December 2021, prohibits unsolicited visits and cold calls by energy retailers and their representatives.

Evidence gathered by the Essential Services Commission indicates that between January and March 2022, 1st Energy signed up 81 new customers through unsolicited home visits conducted by third-party sales agents. Agents gained entry to homes under the pretense of installing in-home energy monitoring devices, but then used the opportunity to solicit energy quotes and contracts from 1st Energy via SMS without the customers’ prior consent.

Commissioner Sitesh Bhojani stated there are clear rules prohibiting these types of unsolicited sales tactics. He said “Retailers who try to get around [the ban] by having third parties conduct these activities on their behalf risk enforcement action.”

1st Energy acknowledged the conduct likely violated Victorian energy laws. It has ceased working with the sales agency in Victoria.

As part of an enforceable undertaking accepted by the Commission, 1st Energy must implement stricter oversight and training on unsolicited sales laws. It will also appoint an independent auditor to monitor compliance.

Bhojani said while the statewide ban has been generally effective, the Commission will take action when evidence of non-compliance emerges. He reminded retailers the ban applies equally to retailers and their agents.

The Victorian Parliament legislated the ban in late 2021 to protect consumers from high-pressure and unwanted marketing tactics. Bhojani said the Commission is also closely monitoring compliance with consumer protection laws requiring clear consent for energy contracts.

This 1st Energy case highlights the need for continued vigilance and proactive compliance to uphold the ban on door-to-door sales. Retailers must take responsibility for the actions of their sales agents and partners. Comprehensive training, auditing, and reporting procedures are essential to prevent unwanted marketing approaches. Swift remediation and penalties for non-compliance will demonstrate the seriousness of these legal protections for consumers. As energy costs rise, regulators must send a strong message that prohibited sales tactics will not be tolerated.

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *