Navigating the NERR: A Guide for Energy Retailers on Payment Plans for Hardship Customers

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

Retailers must comply with the National Energy Retail Rules when establishing payment plans for customers experiencing financial hardship. This includes having regard to the customer’s capacity to pay, any arrears owing by the customer, and the customer’s expected energy consumption needs over the following 12 month period. A payment plan for a hardship customer must include an offer for the customer to pay for their energy consumption in advance or in arrears by instalments.

Retailers should consider adopting the AER’s Sustainable Payment Plans Framework as a good practice framework for assessing customers’ capacity to pay. When offering flexible payment options to hardship customers, retailers should consider whether debt waivers or payment matching are appropriate.

Retailers must also inform customers to whom they offer a payment plan of the duration of the plan, the amount of each instalment payable, the frequency of instalments, the date by which each instalment must be paid, and if the customer is in arrears, the number of instalments to pay the arrears. If the customer is to pay in advance, the retailer must also notify the customer of the basis on which the instalments are calculated.

Retailers must also allow hardship customers to pay using Centrepay in accordance with rule 74. If Centrepay is not available in that customer’s contract, their contract must be reviewed, a new contract made available to them and Centrepay subsequently made available. Retailers must not charge the customer for the review, for any transfer to another retail contract or any early termination charge or other penalty for the early termination of the customer’s previous retail contract.

A visual representation:

Test your knowledge regarding Payment Plans

What must a retailer inform a customer to whom it offers a payment plan? 

The retailer must inform the customer of the duration of the plan, the amount of each instalment payable under the plan, the frequency of instalments and the date by which each instalment must be paid, the number of instalments to pay the arrears (if the customer is in arrears) and the basis on which instalments are calculated (if the customer is to pay in advance).

What must a retailer do for hardship customers in relation to Centrepay? 

A retailer must allow hardship customers to pay using Centrepay in accordance with rule 74. If Centrepay is not available in that customer’s contract, their contract must be reviewed, a new contract made available to them and Centrepay subsequently made available. The retailer must not charge the customer for the review, for any transfer to another retail contract or any early termination charge or other penalty for the early termination of the customer’s previous customer retail contract.

Where a customer is seeking to enter into a payment plan, what is a good resource for retailers to refer to?

Retailers should refer to and also consider adopting the AER’s Sustainable Payment Plans Framework as a good practice framework for assessing customers’ capacity to pay.

Recommendations for Energy Retailers

In summary, retailers should:

  • Comply with the National Energy Retail Rules establishing payment plans for customers experiencing financial hardship
  • Consider adopting the AER’s Sustainable Payment Plans Framework as a good practice framework for assessing customers’ capacity to pay
  • Consider whether debt waivers or payment matching are appropriate
  • Inform customers of the duration of the plan, the amount of each instalment payable, the frequency of instalments, the date by which each instalment must be paid, and if the customer is in arrears, the number of instalments to pay the arrears
  • Allow hardship customers to pay using Centrepay in accordance with rule 74
  • Set out the steps they will use to identify early customers experiencing payment difficulties due to hardship, and the steps they will take to assist a customer for the duration of the time that the customer is a hardship customer

📚 Relevant citations:

  • National Energy Retail Rules – Version 35, Rule 72(1)
  • AER Customer Hardship Policy Guideline – Version 1, Cl. 44(a)
  • National Energy Retail Rules – Version 35, Rule 72(2)
  • AER Customer Hardship Policy Guideline – Version 1, Cl. 44(b)
  • National Energy Retail Law (Schedule of NERL SA Act), Section 50

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *