The Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) Exposure Draft- Part One

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

In May we talked about the Government’s Budget commitment to a new Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) in Budget 2017 and financial services: an opening for the minnows and a warning for the sharks. We talked there about proposals requiring registration of banking executives, the reining in of executive bonuses and disqualification for poor behaviour.

These proposals require legislation in order to amend the Banking Act 1959 and the Treasury consulted on an ‘exposure draft’ of that legislation at the end of last month (September).

Today is the first part of a two-part examination of that exposure draft (henceforth all section references are to that exposure draft Bill). Our focus today is on the new concept of an ‘accountable person’ which will be introduced in order to hold banking executives responsible. In part two we will look at changes to the powers of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) also proposed in the draft Bill.

Who counts as an accountable person?

‘Accountable person’ is defined in the draft Bill both by reference to a general principle and by reference to listed functions or responsibilities.

According to the general principle, an accountable person is the person in a senior executive position with actual or effective management or control of the ADI, or the management or control of a substantial part of an ADI group’s operations (see Schedule 1, item 1, subsection 37BA(1)).

According to the listed functions or responsibilities, an accountable person includes: members of the board, the person under immediate authority of the Board carrying out the management of the ADI (usually the CEO), the person responsible for management of financial resources (CFO) and the person responsible for the management of the operations of the ADI (often the COO). For a full list of the functions see Schedule 1, item 1, subsection 37BA(2)].

The obligations of an accountable person

The key obligations of an accountable person specified in the draft Bill include:

  • To conduct him or herself with honesty and integrity and with due skill care and diligence
  • To deal with APRA in an open, constructive and co-operative way (this does not displace legal professional privilege)
  • To take reasonable steps to comply with the law and prevent other matters which could affect the prudential standing or reputation (see s37CA(1)).

In order to comply with these obligations, it will be necessary for an accountable person to demonstrate that they have taken reasonable steps to meet his or her accountability obligations (see section 37CB).

Note that at this stage these are still only proposals contained in an exposure draft and have not yet been introduced into law. For further information on this exposure draft see https://treasury.gov.au/consultation/c2017-t222462/.

 

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *