Avoiding the Pitfalls of Single System Dependence: Lessons from the JP Morgan Incident

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook

In today’s fast-paced business environment, companies often rely on a single system or process to ensure quality oversight and control. However, this can lead to significant risks and problems, as demonstrated by the JP Morgan incident in 2012.

The JP Morgan incident involved the bank’s use of a single system, used by its trading operations in London known as the ‘London Whale’, to compute VaR (Value at Risk). This system, contained in a single Excel file, failed to accurately identify and assess the VaR associated with the bank’s portfolio of complex financial instruments, leading to a multi-billion dollar loss. A task force report noted ‘Spreadsheet-based calculations were conducted with insufficient controls and frequent formula and code changes were made.’

The incident highlights the dangers of relying on a single system or process for quality oversight and control. When a company relies on a single system, it can become overly dependent on that system and may not have adequate backup or contingency plans in place. This can lead to serious problems if the system fails or is compromised.

Data input into a system can easily compromise the system’s output. Unless that data is verified and able to be traced once entered, analysis of ‘what went wrong’ becomes impossible after the fact.

Additionally, a single system or process may not be able to accurately identify or assess all the risks associated with a particular activity or operation. This can lead to significant financial losses, as well as reputational damage and regulatory penalties.

To mitigate these risks, companies should adopt a more comprehensive and robust approach to quality oversight and control. This may include implementing multiple systems or processes to ensure quality control, and regularly testing and monitoring these systems to ensure they are working as intended and having processes in place to ensure the integrity of data entered into the system.

Additionally, companies should have a contingency plan in place in case of failure of one of these systems. This can include, backup systems, manual procedures, and regular testing of those procedures.

Moreover, companies should also ensure that they have adequate resources and personnel in place to manage and maintain these systems, and to respond quickly and effectively in case of failure or compromise.

In summary, the incident at JP Morgan serves as a reminder of the risks of relying on a single system or process for quality oversight and control. Companies should take a more comprehensive and robust approach to quality control and regularly test and monitor their systems to ensure they are working as intended and have appropriate contingency plans in place.

More to explorer

Technicians installing photovoltaic solar panels on roof of house.

Compliance Quarter’s Submission to the AER’s Review of the Compliance Procedures and Guidelines

On 11 April 2024, Compliance Quarter put forward its submission on proposed changes to the AER Compliance Procedures and Guidelines. The AER is reviewing its Compliance procedures and guidelines, which set out the manner and form in which energy businesses in jurisdictions that have adopted the National Energy Retail Law must submit compliance information and data to the AER. We argue that there should be consideration of measures to incentivise early reporting of potential breaches. These may, for example, take the

person wearing foo dog costume

Obligations of Energy Retailers Regarding Best Offer Information

Energy retailers in Victoria have specific obligations under the Energy Retail Code of Practice to provide clear information to customers about their ‘best offer’ – that is, the plan that would minimize the customer‘s energy costs based on their usage history. The objective is to ensure small customers can easily understand whether they are on the retailer‘s best plan for them and how to access the retailer‘s best offer if not. One of the significant challenges in the energy sector (as in banking and elsewhere) is that customers

low angle photo of sydney opera house australia

Guide to the National Energy Retail Rules

The National Energy Retail Rules (NERR) are a set of rules that govern the sale and supply of electricity and gas by retailers to consumers in Australia, alongside the related National Energy Retail Law (NERL). The NERR came into effect on 1 July 2012 in Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Commonwealth. South Australia followed on 1 February 2013, New South Wales on 1 July 2013, and Queensland on 1 July 2015. The NERR do not yet apply in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *