Avoiding the Pitfalls of Single System Dependence: Lessons from the JP Morgan Incident

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook

In today’s fast-paced business environment, companies often rely on a single system or process to ensure quality oversight and control. However, this can lead to significant risks and problems, as demonstrated by the JP Morgan incident in 2012.

The JP Morgan incident involved the bank’s use of a single system, used by its trading operations in London known as the ‘London Whale’, to compute VaR (Value at Risk). This system, contained in a single Excel file, failed to accurately identify and assess the VaR associated with the bank’s portfolio of complex financial instruments, leading to a multi-billion dollar loss. A task force report noted ‘Spreadsheet-based calculations were conducted with insufficient controls and frequent formula and code changes were made.’

The incident highlights the dangers of relying on a single system or process for quality oversight and control. When a company relies on a single system, it can become overly dependent on that system and may not have adequate backup or contingency plans in place. This can lead to serious problems if the system fails or is compromised.

Data input into a system can easily compromise the system’s output. Unless that data is verified and able to be traced once entered, analysis of ‘what went wrong’ becomes impossible after the fact.

Additionally, a single system or process may not be able to accurately identify or assess all the risks associated with a particular activity or operation. This can lead to significant financial losses, as well as reputational damage and regulatory penalties.

To mitigate these risks, companies should adopt a more comprehensive and robust approach to quality oversight and control. This may include implementing multiple systems or processes to ensure quality control, and regularly testing and monitoring these systems to ensure they are working as intended and having processes in place to ensure the integrity of data entered into the system.

Additionally, companies should have a contingency plan in place in case of failure of one of these systems. This can include, backup systems, manual procedures, and regular testing of those procedures.

Moreover, companies should also ensure that they have adequate resources and personnel in place to manage and maintain these systems, and to respond quickly and effectively in case of failure or compromise.

In summary, the incident at JP Morgan serves as a reminder of the risks of relying on a single system or process for quality oversight and control. Companies should take a more comprehensive and robust approach to quality control and regularly test and monitor their systems to ensure they are working as intended and have appropriate contingency plans in place.

More to explorer

Window lights in multistorey house at night, Kuala Lumpur

A Guide to the Role of the Metering Coordinator

In the complex landscape of the electricity market, the role of the Metering Coordinator (MC) is crucial for ensuring the accurate measurement and efficient coordination of metering services. With the National Electricity Rules (NER) as the guiding framework, AEMO has published a guide to the role of a metering coordinator and this article serves as a summary of that role drawing on the guide. Understanding the Purpose and Scope: The Guide to the Role of the Metering Coordinator is specifically

Digital electric meters in a row measuring power use. Electricity consumption concept.

Roles and Functions in Electricity Metering: A Short Guide

Electricity metering is a complex process that requires the collaboration of various entities to ensure accurate measurement and efficient energy management. Understanding the roles and responsibilities of these entities is crucial for maintaining compliance and facilitating the smooth functioning of the electricity market. In this article, we will explore in detail the key roles in electricity metering, including Financially Responsible Market Participants (FRMPs), Metering Coordinators (MCs), Metering Providers (MPs), and Metering Data Providers (MDPs), as outlined in Chapter 7 of

Preparing to Apply for a Retailer Authorisation: A Comprehensive Guide

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) oversees the authorisation process for energy retailers in Australia. If you’re considering joining this market, it’s crucial to understand the AER’s guidelines and requirements. This article will outline the preparatory steps your business needs to take before applying for a retailer authorisation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *