The Australia-Hong Kong Fintech Agreement: Q & A

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook


By Dr Drew Donnelly, Compliance Quarter.

On 13 June, The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) signed a Cooperation Agreement on financial technology (fintech or FinTech). This agreement aims to facilitate the sharing of information about fintech developments and to assist fintech firms looking to operate in one another’s jurisdictions.

Last month, we discussed the expansion of the ‘regulatory sandbox’ for fintech in Australia through ASIC’s Innovation Hub. Hong Kong has a similar regulatory sandbox and this agreement will mean that the respective hubs will be able to refer businesses from their own jurisdiction to the other for advice and support.

In today’s article, we suggest three questions you might have about the agreement and provide our answers based on the best information available.

What is the scope of the agreement?

While specifics are not yet available, this is an information and advice/referral agreement. Such agreements have also been signed between ASIC and regulators in the United Kingdom, Ontario and Singapore over the last couple of years. This makes it distinct, for example, from the fintech information-sharing only agreement signed in April this year between ASIC and Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Indonesia’s securities regulator).

What is unclear to date is whether this agreement will also contain an undertaking to consider joint innovation or technology projects (note: the agreement has not yet been publicly released). For example, the cooperation agreement signed last year between ASIC and the Monetary Authority of Singapore provided in clause 5.6 that the parties would

“undertake to consider participating in joint innovation projects on the application of key technologies such as digital and mobile payments, blockchain, distributed ledgers, big data, flexible platforms (API) and other areas of new technologies”

Does this relax the legal framework for Hong Kong fintech companies wishing to break into the Australian market?

No. The cooperation agreement, like all the other ASIC agreements with overseas regulators, does not change the domestic law of either country. If a Hong Kong-based fintech operator does not currently have the right to participate in ASIC’s regulatory sandbox, this agreement doesn’t change that. However, it is possible that the increased collaboration between regulators will lead to more consistency across jurisdictions via future legal developments.

Will this lead to ‘regulatory arbitrage’?

Many jurisdictions have developed regulatory sandboxes including Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, China and Thailand. A regulatory sandbox, by definition, involves relaxing regulatory constraints for fintech, under certain conditions. However, the precise nature of the sandboxes differs radically across different jurisdictions. For example, in Hong Kong the regulatory sandbox is only available to “Authorised Institutions” which is defined as banks, restricted licence banks and deposit-taking companies. The ASIC regulatory sandbox does not have a similar restriction on the type of entity that can use the sandbox.

This creates a risk of ‘regulatory arbitrage’ – a risk that an entity in one jurisdiction will use a more favourable regulatory environment in one jurisdiction to market products that wouldn’t otherwise be permitted. For a recent example of this occurring in the United States see

Note, however, as well as the answer that we gave to question two (the agreement does not change existing law), a key purpose of this agreement is to share information about fintech development and regulation across jurisdictions. In light of this, it is likely that the regulatory environment in the different jurisdictions will become more consistent over time. Earlier this month, the Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (ASIFMA) released a comprehensive report, Best Practices for Effective Development of Fintech, emphasising that it is in the best interests of the fintech sector for the Asia-Pacific region to collaborate more in fintech development.

More to explorer

notes on board

How to Manage Multiple Compliance Deadlines: A Case Study

Compliance managers in the energy sector are constantly juggling a large work load with competing deadlines. Managing time effectively is a core skill for compliance managers. In this article, we will present a hypothetical case study of a compliance manager in an energy retailer who has to juggle multiple compliance tasks and deadlines, and how they can use some strategies and tools to manage their workload and prioritise effectively. We will also share some insights and tips from Compliance Quarter,

laptop on table top

How to Avoid Compliance Risks by Effective Communication: A Case Study

Compliance managers in the energy sector face many challenges in ensuring that their businesses comply with the regulatory framework. One of the most common and frustrating situations is when their advice is ignored or overridden by senior management or other stakeholders, exposing the business to potential compliance risks and penalties. In this article, we will present a hypothetical case study of a compliance manager in an energy retailer who faced this scenario and how it affected the business outcomes. We

Contemporary design of multifamily living houses. Modern luxury apartments buildings.

Modernising Electricity Regulation: The AES Framework and Embedded Networks in Western Australia

Background The existing licensing framework overseeing the sale and supply of electricity in Western Australia (WA) has struggled to adapt to the rapid expansion of emerging and atypical electricity business models in recent years. To address this, in 2019, the then Minister for Energy commissioned Energy Policy WA to assess the regulatory framework in Western Australia. In 2020, Energy Policy WA initiated consultations on a proposed regulatory framework for various categories of ‘alternative electricity services’ called the Alternative Electricity Services

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *