Alinta Energy improves systems and waives more than $1 million in customer debt following an AER investigation.

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

On 8 October 2021, the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) announced that, in response to an investigation, Alinta Energy have substantially improved its systems and was waiving more than $1 million in energy debt owed by more than 400 of its customers.  The outcome arose as a result of an investigation carried out by the AER into alleged non-compliance with Alinta Energy’s obligations with respect to vulnerable customers and its hardship program.

The AER was concerned that during the period September 2019 to March 2020, Alinta Energy may have required vulnerable customers to make upfront payments or to seek financial counselling in circumstances where it should have offered those customer’s access to payment plans or assistance under Alinta’s hardship program.  Furthermore, the AER alleged that in some cases Alinta Energy had wrongfully disconnected customers for non-payment of their energy bills.

In commenting on the investigation, AER Chair Clare Savage said, “We are very concerned about the alleged conduct, in particular Alinta’s lack of identification of customers in hardship.”  

The outcome of the investigation is noteworthy in that the matter was concluded by agreement resulting in customers directly benefiting by the waiver of debt.  The AER noted that, “had it not been for Alinta’s willingness to acknowledge the AER’s concerns, improved its systems and processes, and offer substantial customer redress, we would have taken this matter further.”  As far as we are aware, this is the first instance where such an outcome has been negotiated between the regulator and an energy retailer.

Lessons: As with all enforcement actions, there are a number of lessons that energy retailers can take away from this matter.  These include the importance of ensuring that customer hardship policies are strictly adhered to.  Inter alia, this means that retailers must not require customers experiencing financial hardship or payment difficulties to see a financial counsellor and/or make an upfront payment towards arrears owing on their accounts.  Retailers should not automatically cancel customers payment plans after one missed payment and instead should contact the relevant customer in a timely manner to assist with that missed payment as required by their hardship program.  Finally, all retailers must ensure that disconnection is a last resort measure.

More to explorer

werribee park mansion

Victoria consults on lower prices for embedded network customers

The Victorian Government has opened consultation on proposed pricing reforms for embedded networks, following its announcement that it intends to require lower energy prices for households and small businesses in those networks. The consultation is relevant to residential and small commercial embedded network customers, embedded network operators, exempt sellers and suppliers, licensed retailers operating in embedded networks, owners corporations, retirement villages, caravan parks, shopping centres and providers of bundled energy-related services such as bulk hot water, centralised heating and cooling.

smartphone beside a magnifying glass

Energy Retailer Assurance Audits in 2026: An Australian Guide

Assurance audits used to be a tick-the-box exercise. They are not anymore. With the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) refreshing its Compliance Procedures and Guidelines and releasing an updated Practice Guide for Compliance Audits last year energy retailers in Australia are operating in a sharper, more evidence-driven assurance environment than at any point in the National Energy Retail Law’s history. This post explains, in plain English, what an assurance audit looks like under the current settings, where the AER is looking hardest in 2025/26, and

street road near green and yellow trees

Embracing the uncertainty of rapid advancement and adoption of general artificial intelligence for energy businesses

The way businesses and professionals interact with artificial intelligence has changed. Over the past two months, we have observed a shift across our client base and the broader regulatory and legal community that goes beyond curiosity or experimentation. Professionals who were previously sceptical are now actively engaging with AI tools. Those who were already experimenting are finding that the tools have become materially more capable than they were even six months ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *